2002 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 2009 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Alfa Romeo 147. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 (246 HP) has 93 more horse power than 2009 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 should accelerate faster than 2009 Daewoo Tocsa.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 (300 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Tocsa. 2009 Daewoo Tocsa has automatic transmission and 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 has manual transmission. 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Daewoo Tocsa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 147 | 2009 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Daewoo |
Model | 147 | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 246 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |