2002 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Alfa Romeo 147. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 127 more horse power than 2002 Alfa Romeo 147. (113 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2002 Alfa Romeo 147.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 (275 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | 147 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 275 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.8 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
