2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (173 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt. (141 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt.
Because 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1941 Chrysler Thunderbolt | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
| Model | 156 | Thunderbolt |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
