2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1946 Lancia Ardea 3
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 631 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lancia |
Model | 156 | Ardea 3 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 903 cc |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 28 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 6.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 674 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 29 L |