2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1949 Buick 40
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (163 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1949 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1949 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 357 kg more than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 1949 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1949 Buick 40 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Buick |
Model | 156 | 40 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 104.8 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1338 kg | 1695 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3000 mm |