2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1961 Austin A 60
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (173 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1961 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (385 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1961 Austin A 60 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | 156 | A 60 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 1621 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 385 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 34 L |