2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (247 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 605 kg more than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 156 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3179 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 79 L |
