2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty

To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. (173 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 610 kg more than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Alfa Romeo 156 1964 Cadillac Sixty
Make Alfa Romeo Cadillac
Model 156 Sixty
Year Released 2002 1964
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2387 cc 7027 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 173 HP 208 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4600 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1510 kg 2120 kg
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 5670 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 3300 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 79 L