2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (275 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Triumph |
Model | 156 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 275 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |