2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (163 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (206 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | 156 | 66 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |