2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1978 Fiat 133
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Fiat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Fiat 133 would be higher. At 1,747 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (138 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1978 Fiat 133. (33 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1978 Fiat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 702 kg more than 1978 Fiat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Fiat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Fiat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (163 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Fiat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Fiat 133.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1978 Fiat 133 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Fiat |
Model | 156 | 133 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 842 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 54 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 7.9:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1392 kg | 690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2030 mm |