2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,747 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (138 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (163 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | 156 | 66 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |