2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1993 Mazda 626

To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (120 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626.

Because 1993 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Mazda 626 (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. (147 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1993 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Alfa Romeo 156 1993 Mazda 626
Make Alfa Romeo Mazda
Model 156 626
Year Released 2002 1993
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 1989 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 147 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.6 mm 92 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 60 L