2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro

To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 386 kg more than 1998 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. (385 Nm). This means 1998 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Alfa Romeo 156 1998 Chevrolet Camaro
Make Alfa Romeo Chevrolet
Model 156 Camaro
Year Released 2002 1998
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3458 cc 5666 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 300 HP 0 HP
Torque 385 Nm 468 Nm
Engine Bore Size 97 mm 99 mm
Engine Stroke Size 78 mm 92 mm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1910 kg 1524 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4920 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2570 mm