2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 200 kg more than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. (163 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Alfa Romeo 156 2004 Cadillac CTS
Make Alfa Romeo Cadillac
Model 156 CTS
Year Released 2002 2004
Body Type Station Wagon Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1747 cc 3179 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 138 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 298 Nm
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82.7 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1392 kg 1592 kg
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 66 L