2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2004 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2004 Pagani Zonda is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 379 more horse power than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 88 kg more than 2004 Pagani Zonda.
Because 2004 Pagani Zonda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Pagani Zonda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2004 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Pagani |
Model | 156 | Zonda |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 542 HP |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 335 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.2 seconds | 3.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1338 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2730 mm |