2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (248 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (300 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 156 | E-350 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 248 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 57 L |