2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (163 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (206 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
Model | 156 | Clio |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.2 seconds | 15 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |