2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado

To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156.

Because 2012 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. (163 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. 2012 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 has manual transmission. 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: