2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 479 kg more than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 2013 Ferrari California is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ferrari California. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 357 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. (147 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2013 Ferrari California | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ferrari |
| Model | 156 | California |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 504 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.6 mm | 77 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1709 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4562 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1308 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 78 L |
