2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 88 kg more than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (281 Nm @ 5600 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. (163 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mini |
Model | 156 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1392 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4133 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 47 L |