2002 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1946 Lancia Ardea 3
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 821 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lancia |
Model | 166 | Ardea 3 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 903 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 28 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 674 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 29 L |