2002 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1959 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,380 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 (237 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac DeVille. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 525 kg more than 2002 Alfa Romeo 166.
Because 1959 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1959 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 166 | DeVille |
Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3178 cc | 6380 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3310 mm |