2002 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Zastava |
Model | 166 | 850 K |
Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2010 mm |