2002 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Alfa Romeo 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 (173 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 (385 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 166 | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 166 | Epica |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 385 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |