2002 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Alfa Romeo 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2002 Alfa Romeo 166. (173 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2002 Alfa Romeo 166.
Because 2011 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 (385 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden UTE. (350 Nm). This means 2002 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 166 | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 166 | UTE |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 385 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |