2002 Alpina B 10 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2002 Alpina B 10 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,619 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Alpina B 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alpina B 10 (342 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 293 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alpina B 10 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Alpina B 10 weights approximately 976 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Alpina B 10 (490 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Alpina B 10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alpina B 10 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Alpina | Zastava |
Model | B 10 | 102 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 4619 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 490 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2160 mm |