2002 Ariel Atom vs. 2009 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2009 Holden Caprice is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ariel Atom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ariel Atom would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 235 more horse power than 2002 Ariel Atom. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2002 Ariel Atom.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ariel Atom. (148 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ariel Atom. 2009 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 2002 Ariel Atom has manual transmission. 2002 Ariel Atom will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ariel Atom | 2009 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Ariel | Holden |
| Model | Atom | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
