2002 Ascari Ecosse vs. 1950 Holden FX

To start off, 2002 Ascari Ecosse is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 4,722 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ascari Ecosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ascari Ecosse (396 HP) has 345 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ascari Ecosse should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ascari Ecosse weights approximately 277 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ascari Ecosse (678 Nm) has 542 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2002 Ascari Ecosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications: