2002 Ascari Ecosse vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2002 Ascari Ecosse is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 808 kg more than 2002 Ascari Ecosse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ascari Ecosse | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Ascari | Cadillac |
| Model | Ecosse | 62 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4722 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 396 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1247 kg | 2055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1370 mm |
