2002 Ascari Ecosse vs. 1964 Holden EH
To start off, 2002 Ascari Ecosse is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 4,722 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ascari Ecosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ascari Ecosse (396 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ascari Ecosse should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ascari Ecosse weights approximately 132 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ascari Ecosse (678 Nm) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm). This means 2002 Ascari Ecosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ascari Ecosse | 1964 Holden EH | |
Make | Ascari | Holden |
Model | Ecosse | EH |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4722 cc | 2928 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 396 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 678 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1247 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1490 mm |