2002 Ascari Ecosse vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2002 Ascari Ecosse is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 4,722 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ascari Ecosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ascari Ecosse (396 HP) has 307 more horse power than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ascari Ecosse should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ascari Ecosse | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Ascari | Triumph |
| Model | Ecosse | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4722 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 396 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 91.9 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.6 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1530 mm |
