2002 Ascari Ecosse vs. 1996 Daewoo Brougham
To start off, 2002 Ascari Ecosse is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Brougham would be higher. At 4,722 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ascari Ecosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ascari Ecosse (396 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 287 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Brougham. (109 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ascari Ecosse should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Brougham weights approximately 53 kg more than 2002 Ascari Ecosse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ascari Ecosse | 1996 Daewoo Brougham | |
Make | Ascari | Daewoo |
Model | Ecosse | Brougham |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4722 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 396 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1247 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1420 mm |