2002 Ascari Ecosse vs. 2004 Holden UTE
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ascari Ecosse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ascari Ecosse would be higher. At 4,722 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ascari Ecosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ascari Ecosse (396 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2004 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ascari Ecosse should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 253 kg more than 2002 Ascari Ecosse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ascari Ecosse (678 Nm) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden UTE. (305 Nm). This means 2002 Ascari Ecosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ascari Ecosse | 2004 Holden UTE | |
Make | Ascari | Holden |
Model | Ecosse | UTE |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4722 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 396 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 678 Nm | 305 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1247 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1490 mm |