2002 Ascari Ecosse vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ascari Ecosse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ascari Ecosse would be higher. At 4,722 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ascari Ecosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ascari Ecosse (396 HP) has 326 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ascari Ecosse should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ascari Ecosse weights approximately 507 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ascari Ecosse (678 Nm) has 576 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2002 Ascari Ecosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ascari Ecosse | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Ascari | MCC |
Model | Ecosse | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 4722 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 396 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 678 Nm | 102 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1247 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1520 mm |