2002 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1957 Buick 40
To start off, 2002 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Aston Martin V12 (556 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Buick 40. (515 Nm). This means 2002 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Aston Martin V12 | 1957 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Buick |
| Model | V12 | 40 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 5967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 248 HP |
| Torque | 556 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3110 mm |
