2002 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1959 Austin A 95
To start off, 2002 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Aston Martin V12 (556 Nm) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 95. (176 Nm). This means 2002 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 95.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Aston Martin V12 | 1959 Austin A 95 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Austin |
| Model | V12 | A 95 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2638 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 91 HP |
| Torque | 556 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2690 mm |
