2002 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2002 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Aston Martin V12. (556 Nm). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Aston Martin V12. 1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2002 Aston Martin V12 has manual transmission. 2002 Aston Martin V12 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Aston Martin V12 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
| Model | V12 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 6381 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 325 HP |
| Torque | 556 Nm | 583 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3310 mm |
