2002 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2002 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Aston Martin V12 | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
Model | V12 | 62 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3310 mm |