2002 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1966 Holden HD
To start off, 2002 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Aston Martin V12 (556 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm). This means 2002 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Aston Martin V12 | 1966 Holden HD | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Holden |
| Model | V12 | HD |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2930 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Torque | 556 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
