2002 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2002 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Aston Martin V12 (556 Nm) has 504 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 2002 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Aston Martin V12 | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Aston Martin | ZAZ |
Model | V12 | 966 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Torque | 556 Nm | 52 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2170 mm |