2002 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1979 Chrysler Avenger
To start off, 2002 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler Avenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler Avenger would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Aston Martin V12 (556 Nm) has 463 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chrysler Avenger. (93 Nm). This means 2002 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chrysler Avenger. 1979 Chrysler Avenger has automatic transmission and 2002 Aston Martin V12 has manual transmission. 2002 Aston Martin V12 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chrysler Avenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Aston Martin V12 | 1979 Chrysler Avenger | |
Make | Aston Martin | Chrysler |
Model | V12 | Avenger |
Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 556 Nm | 93 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2500 mm |