2002 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Aston Martin V12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Aston Martin V12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Aston Martin V12 | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Aston Martin | Oldsmobile |
Model | V12 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |