2002 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1989 Holden Apollo

To start off, 2002 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2002 Aston Martin V12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Aston Martin V12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Aston Martin V12 (556 Nm) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Holden Apollo. (171 Nm). This means 2002 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Holden Apollo. 1989 Holden Apollo has automatic transmission and 2002 Aston Martin V12 has manual transmission. 2002 Aston Martin V12 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Holden Apollo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Aston Martin V12 1989 Holden Apollo
Make Aston Martin Holden
Model V12 Apollo
Year Released 2002 1989
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6000 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 118 HP
Torque 556 Nm 171 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2610 mm