2002 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1992 Mazda 323
To start off, 2002 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Mazda 323 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Aston Martin V12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 323 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Aston Martin V12 (556 Nm) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 323. (235 Nm). This means 2002 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Aston Martin V12 | 1992 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mazda |
Model | V12 | 323 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 556 Nm | 235 Nm |
Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 218 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2370 mm |