2002 Aston Martin V12 vs. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2002 Aston Martin V12 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Aston Martin V12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Aston Martin V12 (556 Nm) has 417 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2002 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Aston Martin V12 | 1996 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Chevrolet |
| Model | V12 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1589 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
| Torque | 556 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2210 mm |
