2002 Aston Martin V12 vs. 2003 Jaguar X-Type

To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Aston Martin V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Aston Martin V12 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2002 Aston Martin V12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Aston Martin V12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Aston Martin V12 (556 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. (331 Nm). This means 2002 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jaguar X-Type.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Aston Martin V12 2003 Jaguar X-Type
Make Aston Martin Jaguar
Model V12 X-Type
Year Released 2002 2003
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6000 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 126 HP
Torque 556 Nm 331 Nm
Top Speed 300 km/hour 193 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4720 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2790 mm