2002 Aston Martin V12 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5

To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Aston Martin V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Aston Martin V12 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2002 Aston Martin V12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Aston Martin V12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Aston Martin V12 (556 Nm) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-5. (203 Nm). This means 2002 Aston Martin V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-5. 2013 Mazda CX-5 has automatic transmission and 2002 Aston Martin V12 has manual transmission. 2002 Aston Martin V12 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Aston Martin V12 2013 Mazda CX-5
Make Aston Martin Mazda
Model V12 CX-5
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Coupe Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6000 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 153 HP
Torque 556 Nm 203 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4555 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 2165 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1710 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2700 mm