2002 Aston Martin V12 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz M
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Aston Martin V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Aston Martin V12 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Aston Martin V12 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Aston Martin V12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M (700 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Aston Martin V12. (556 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Aston Martin V12.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Aston Martin V12 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz M | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | V12 | M |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 511 HP |
| Torque | 556 Nm | 700 Nm |
| Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4817 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2141 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1796 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2915 mm |
