2002 Audi A2 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2002 Audi A2 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A2 (108 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A2 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi A2 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A2 (155 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A2 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A2 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 57 L |